Event of the Month
The limits of Europe
DOOR TO TURKEY’S EU ACCESSION AJAR, BUT NO GUARANTEES GIVEN
WRITTEN BY Balázs Pócs
European leaders have decided to open the
European Union’s door to Turkey for EU membership talks,
but due to strong opposition from certain member states,
Brussels specified such discussions are no guarantee for
eventual admission. The rather lengthy list of EU requirements
is topped by the request that Ankara recognize Cyprus before
membership talks begin in October 2005. The EU will also
start accession negotiations with Croatia next year, while
Romania and Bulgaria are slated to sign accession treaties
in April 2005.
Turkey clearly dominated the Dec. 16-17 EU summit in Brussels.
Although the country’s membership bid was finally accepted,
European heads of state and government set tough pre-conditions.
The 25 EU leaders said they would open accession negotiations
with Turkey Oct. 3, 2005, but warned talks would be open-ended
with no guaranteed outcome. French President Jacques Chirac,
one of the main opponents of Turkish membership, tried to
reassure the deeply skeptical public opinion. “Turkey faces
a long and hard journey over the next 10-15 years to attain
its goal of joining the European Union. The opening of negotiations
does not, naturally, mean accession,” he stressed. But whatever
happens, the landmark deal will certainly change the face
of Europe and Turkey in coming decades. “It is a historic
event. It shows that those who believe there is some fundamental
clash in civilizations between Christians and Muslims are
actually wrong,” British Prime Minister Tony Blair said after
the summit.
ANKARA UNHAPPY OVER CYPRUS CRITERION
Despite the last minute
agreement, Turkish Prime Minister Racep Tayyip Erdogan said
he was disappointed by the EU’s insistence on Cyprus. As
a pre-condition for starting accession talks, Ankara will
have to extend a 1963 customs agreement to cover the 10 new
member states, including Cyprus. This would actually mean
acknowledging Cyprus as an EU member, which has not been
the case so far. Dutch Premier Jan-Peter Balkenende, holder
of the EU presidency, was careful to stress that “this in
itself is not a formal and legal recognition of Cyprus, but
it is a step that can lead to progress.” Cyprus has been
divided as a Greek-controlled south and Turkish-controlled
north since Turkey invaded the country in 1974. Currently,
Ankara has 30,000 troops stationed on the island. Turkey
has always refused to recognize the Greek Cypriot government
– a government that is now an EU member. Negotiations at
the Brussels summit were intense and sometimes emotional.
At one point, Erdogan threatened to walk out after Cyprus
demanded a written commitment. “You are choosing 600,000
Greek Cypriots over 70 million Turks, and I cannot explain
this to my people,” he told Balkenende. The Turkish premier
was finally dissuaded by Blair, Balkenende and German Chancellor
Gerhard Schroeder. EU leaders even kept UN Secretary-General
Kofi Annan waiting for one-and-a-half-hours as they negotiated
the Cyprus issue. Cyprus aside, the Turkish prime minister
returned home to a hero’s welcome after the Brussels summit.
Addressing thousands of cheering people in Ankara, Erdogan
said: “Turkey will become different in every way. We will
not rest on our laurels because our aim every day now is
to move forward, forward, forward.”
A LONG AND ARDUOUS PATH
The integration of Turkey, however, will be a long and uncertain
process. The final agreement made clear that Ankara could
join the EU in 2014 at the earliest. Chirac underlined
that each EU member has the right to block negotiations
with Turkey if deemed necessary. He himself has promised
French voters a referendum on Turkey’s entry. “Violations
of human rights or other fundamental rights could see the
EU suspend accession talks at any moment during the negotiation
period,” the French president warned in Brussels. Analysts
also warned that the Turkish issue may well be an obstacle
in the ratification of the EU’s first constitution. All
25 member states must approve the document and at least
10 have announced they will hold referendums. “If there
is a link between Turkey and the constitution, we will
lose the referendum. It is as simple as that,” French Foreign
Minister Michel Barnier told reporters in Paris. According
to a recent poll, 67% of the French oppose Turkish membership.
A protest vote may also threaten ratification in the Netherlands,
Denmark and the UK.
EASTERN EXPANSION
Well before Turkey may join the European Union, a second
wave of eastern enlargement will take place. EU leaders
gave the final green light to Romania and Bulgaria for
joining in 2007. Member states agreed that the accession
treaties, outlining the exact terms of membership for both
countries, should be signed in April 2005. “Today, Bulgaria
saw the shores of the promised land. After a long journey,
our efforts have been rewarded,” said Bulgarian Foreign
Minister Solomon Passy. Nevertheless, the European Commission
will continue to monitor the two countries closely, particularly
Romania, which only finished negotiating the last chapters
of EU legislation a few days before the Brussels summit.
For Bulgaria, the chapter on justice and home affairs was
singled out to be watched closely, while in Romania, competition
and environmental issues will be followed more closely
by the EU. Safeguard clauses may be applied for both countries
before they join and for three years after they become
members, in case they fall back on commitments. As for
the accession date, Bulgaria and Romania agreed their entry
could be delayed to 2008 from 2007 if they fail to implement
agreed reforms on fighting corruption, strengthening borders,
reinforcing the judicial system and ending illegal state
aid in various economic sectors. While Bulgaria’s accession
may only be delayed by a unanimous vote of the 25 member
states, in the case of Romania a qualified majority decision
is enough.
CROATIA IN 2009?
Croatia will be allowed to start accession negotiations in
March 2005 but only if Zagreb shows it is fully cooperating
with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former
Yugoslavia (ICTY). The green light has another condition
attached. In their final statement, EU leaders “reiterated
that remaining inductees must be located and transferred
to The Hague as soon as possible.”
This refers to general Ante Gotovina, the UN court’s third
most wanted fugitive. He disappeared the day before the tribunal
made public his indictment in July 2001 and has not yet been
found. Chief war crimes prosecutor Carla del Ponte told the
UN Security Council in November 2004 that Zagreb failed to
cooperate sufficiently in catching Gotovina. Although the
general is accused of killings during Croatia’s final offensive
against rebel Serbs in 1995, he is regarded by many Croats
as a war hero.
Zagreb wanted an unconditional date for accession talks,
but EU members (especially the UK, the Netherlands and Sweden)
wanted to maintain pressure. Croatia had originally hoped
to catch up with Bulgaria and Romania in joining the EU in
2007, but diplomats now say 2009 is the earliest realistic
date.
Turkey: pros and cons in brief
Supporters of Turkey’s accession argue that Turkey’s geopolitical
situation, its culture and religion could constitute a
bridge between Europe and the Muslim world. The country
has the second-biggest army in NATO and a strategic reach
into the Middle East. Turkey also has one of Europe’s fastest
growing economies. The prospect of membership is forcing
the Turkish government to pursue economic and political
reforms. Meanwhile, opponents claim that despite impressive
progress on paper, Turkey is still lagging seriously behind
in its fight against human rights abuses and corruption.
Geographically and culturally, Muslim Turkey is more Asiatic
than European. The country’s size would impose great strain
on the EU budget, with huge financial transfers needed
to bring Turkey’s infrastructure and administration up
to European levels.
|